Skip to main content

Bombs, bloodshed and Osama bin Laden's ghost: The rise of the new al-Qaeda

WHEN Osama bin Laden's forehead was blasted open by elite US soldiers nearly three years ago, many hoped it would also signal the death of al-Qaeda.
But his terror group is widely considered to be on the rise again.The jihadist organisation has once again made itself known through bloodshed, just as al-Qaeda death squads made the world pay attention after they ploughed airliners into the World Trade Centre on September 11, 2001.Masked gunmen captured two major Iraqi cities from authorities last week. A suicide bombing caused devastation in Beirut - killing at least 23. And the carnage continues in Syria, most of it unreported.Al-Qaeda claimed responsibility of each of these attacks."There has been a resurgence in al-Qaeda related violence," said Clive Williams, a former Australian intelligence officer and a visiting national security professor at the Australian National University.

OK, but who are these people?
 The terror group affiliate is known as ISIS, which stands for the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. In the past it has been known as al-Qaeda in Iraq, or AQI.Last week, brigades of ISIS gunmen seized two major Iraqi cities from authorities in a bloody battle: Ramadi, 110km west of Baghdad, and Fallujah, also known as "the city of mosques".Fallujah has been in the headlines before. It's the same city that was home to one of the bloodiest battles after the US invaded Iraq in 2003.As much as 60 per cent of the city - businesses, homes, mosques - were destroyed in air strikes and gun battles between insurgents and the so-called Coalition of the Willing. ISIS is considered such a threat as it's not limited to the one country. It operates in Iraq and Syria, neighbouring countries, where it battles for both the Syrian opposition and against the Iraqi government. Ironically, al-Qaeda in Iraq was formed in response to the American-led invasion of that country in 2003, according to a former CIA intelligence analyst. "It was founded by foreign al-Qaeda operatives who entered Iraq in the wake of the US invasion to kill both Americans and Shi'a," Kenneth Pollack, former CIA intelligence analyst and expert on Middle East politics and military affairs, told the US Congress last year.

Hang on, why didn't al-Qaeda die with Bin Laden? 
 The core organisation which carried out the 9/11 attacks has largely been destroyed by intelligence agencies and military forces, according to Western security officials. But it has never been a centralised group. World leaders, including US President Barack Obama, compare the group to cancer. "The core al-Qaeda is on its heels ... decimated," Obama said at a press conference in September last year. The main 'tumour' was destroyed by the military forces that took out Bin Laden and at least 22 of the group's 30 leaders. But, the president said, "al-Qaeda and other extremists have metastasised (like tumours) into regional groups that can pose significant dangers". And that's what the world is seeing now, particularly in countries such as Iraq and Syria, as well as Libya and the region known as the Horn of Africa.

So what do ISIS believe in? 
 Much the same as al-Qaeda's traditional goals. It wishes to establish, through violent means, a "caliphate" - an Islamic state led by a caliph, a successor to the Prophet Muhammad. "They are there for a political reason: to lay the groundwork for a caliphate," Charles Lister, an analyst of the Syrian rebellion, told The New York Review of Books . ISIS is led by the shadowy figure Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, an Iraqi extremist who has overseen a series of attacks in Iraq and is understood to have ordered the group to expand into Syria. It is unknown whether he follows any directives from al-Qaeda high command.

Why are there all these different groups that call themselves al-Qaeda?
You're not wrong if you think sometimes it sounds as if every group that goes around toting powerful assault weapons and shouting fundamentalist Islamic phrases claims to be "linked to al-Qaeda". There are similar groups throughout the Middle East and South-East Asia and Prof Williams explains there is a clever reason for this. Marketing. In a world of brands, al-Qaeda's the top name in terrorism. "They're exploiting the name of al-Qaeda," Prof Williams said. "It's a respected brand, which is good for recruiting and financing and establishing links with similar groups."

Can they be stopped? 
We don't know - but it's happened before, in Iraq at least. Many Iraqi tribes, communities and rebels turned their backs on AQI during the American occupation last decade, bringing a short peace to the region. The US military has deployed dozens of Hellfire missiles and small, unarmed surveillance drones in recent weeks, but they won't be putting troops on the ground. "We're not contemplating putting boots on the ground. This is their fight, but we're going to help them in their fight," Secretary of State John Kerry said, the Los Angeles Times reported. Australia, too, has no plans to intervene. And it's difficult to say things are looking up. Violence even struck the Iraqi capital, Baghdad, on Sunday. Three car bombs and two roadside bombs exploded in several parts of the city, killing at least 18 and wounding dozens.

Source:  http://www.news.com.au/world/middle-east/bombs-bloodshed-and-osama-bin-ladens-ghost-the-rise-of-the-new-alqaeda/story-fnh81ifq-1226796468685

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India-Malaysia ties and the future

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is on his first official visit to India. The main aim of this visit is to seek support for Malaysia’s application to join Brics and to fortify bilateral ties, as the country is keen to improve its connections with one of the rapidly expanding economies in Asia. In light of the increasing crumbling of the global order, particularly stemming from trade disputes between the United States and China, as well as the proxy conflict involving the United States and Russia, Malaysia is encouraged to reassess its foreign policy to uphold its neutral stance. Given India’s status as the largest democracy and the fifth-largest economy globally, along with its notable advancements in indigenous space and defence technologies, it is proposed that India emerge as Malaysia’s key partner in the years ahead. Why India is important for Malaysia The historical ties between India and Malaysia extend back several centuries, with significant Indian cultural, religious, and administ...

THE HISTORY OF TERRORISM: MORE THAN 200 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT

The history of terrorism dates back at least 1500 years when Jewish resistance groups (66 - 72 A.D.) known as Zealots killed Roman soldiers and destroyed Roman property. The term assassin comes from a Shi'ite Muslim sect (Nizari Isma'ilis - also known as hashashins "hashish-eaters") fighting Sunni Muslims (1090 - 1275) and during Medieval Christendom resisting occupation during the Crusades (1095-1291). The hashashins were known to spread terror in the form of murder, including women and children. The brotherhood of Assassins committed terror so as to gain paradise and seventy-two virgins if killed and to receive unlimited hashish while on earth. The modern development of terrorism began during the French Revolution's Reign of Terror (1793 - 1794). During this period the term terrorism was first coined. Through the past two hundred years, terrorism has been used to achieve political ends and has developed as a tool for liberation, oppression, and i...

The by-election in Kuala Kubu Baharu (KKB) and the Indian electorate

  I was born in Malaysia, belonging to the Indian ethnic group, which constitutes approximately 7% of the country's total population. My durable credence is that I am Malaysian first and foremost, and only then do I identify myself as Indian. Regrettably, it saddens me to witness and hear about the actions of certain politicians who question my loyalty to Malaysia. What is even more disheartening is that some Malaysians have been influenced by the manipulative rhetoric of these self-serving politicians. Recently, I have observed numerous discussions on both mainstream and online news platforms regarding the recognition and inclusion of Indians by ruling parties. Surprisingly, even the opposition has displayed a significant interest in the welfare of Indians. Upon contemplating the reasons behind this sudden surge in attention towards Indians, it becomes evident that it is primarily driven by the upcoming Kuala Kubu Baharu (KKB) by-election. It is noteworthy that such ...